Author：

Abstract：

Journal：柳叶刀

Publishing Time：

DOI：10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30557-2

Author：

Abstract：

Journal：International journal of surgery

Publishing Time：

DOI：10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.002

Author：Alexander e. Gorbalenya

Abstract：The present outbreak of a coronavirus-associated acute respiratory disease called coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is the third documented spillover of an animal coronavirus to humans in only two decades that has resulted in a major epidemic. The Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG) of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, which is responsible for developing the classification of viruses and taxon nomenclature of the family Coronaviridae, has assessed the placement of the human pathogen, tentatively named 2019-nCoV, within the Coronaviridae. Based on phylogeny, taxonomy and established practice, the CSG recognizes this virus as forming a sister clade to the prototype human and bat severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses (SARS-CoVs) of the species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus, and designates it as SARS-CoV-2. In order to facilitate communication, the CSG proposes to use the following naming convention for individual isolates: SARSCoV-2/host/location/isolate/date. While the full spectrum of clinical manifestations associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections in humans remains to be determined, the independent zoonotic transmission of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 highlights the need for studying viruses at the species level to complement research focused on individual pathogenic viruses of immediate significance. This will improve our understanding of virus–host interactions in an ever-changing environment and enhance our preparedness for future outbreaks.

Journal：Nature Microbiology

Publishing Time：12-7月-05

DOI：10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z

Author：Zhiwen Hu

Abstract：Less aligned emphasis has been given to naming the 2019 novel coronavirus and pandemic disease. Global profusion of squab names has found their ways in daily communication, and our survey promises to articulate that many of them may have contributed to backlash against Chinese people. Here, based on brief critical reviews on the naming of coronavirus and human coronaviruses, we scrutinize a clear sense of pros and cons of previous multifarious names and punctuate heuristic introspection of naming practices. Our findings suggest that full-fledged official names are duly contribute to the resilience of healthy collective usages in current infodemic scenario.

Journal：Preprints

Publishing Time：2020, 2020020380

DOI：10.20944/preprints202002.0380.v1

Author：Fu Ziqiao

Abstract：

Journal：Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Publishing Time：2020,19(2)

DOI：10.7507/1671-6205.202002012