Development of the Spatial Scope Dataset of
Zang-Qiang-Yi Corridor
Xing, L. G.1 Zhang, Y.1* Kan, A. K.1,2 Dai, H.3 Cheng, J. L.1 Chen, Y.1 Liu, T.3
1. College of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning,
Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
2. Research Center for Human Geography of Tibetan
Plateau and Its Eastern Slope, Key Research Base of Humanities and Social
Sciences of College in Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610059, China;
3. College of Earth Sciences, Chengdu University of
Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
Abstract:
As one of the five ethnic corridors in China, the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor is a
historical witness to the interaction and exchange among Zang, Qiang, Yi, and
other ethnic minorities in southwest China. However,
the spatial scope of the corridor has not been clearly defined. This study
preliminarily defines the spatial scope of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor by
considering the natural geographical conditions and human
characteristics, and constructing the ethnic minority cultural exchange index
as the key index for scope identification. The study uses multiple sources of
data, such as basic geographical information, intangible cultural heritage
distribution, and national population census, to develop the spatial scope of
Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor Dataset. Results show that the spatial
scope of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor includes 162 county-level administrative
regions, involving 25 cities and states in Sichuan province, Yunnan province,
Guizhou province, Xizang autonomous region, and Qinghai province. The dataset
includes boundary data of the corridor, population proportion of ethnic
minorities in the counties (cities) of the corridor, distribution of intangible
cultural heritage, and ethnic minority cultural exchange index
data. The dataset is archived in. shp and. xlsx formats, consisting of 9 data
files, with data size of 4.05 MB (compressed to 1 file, 2.54 MB).
Keywords: Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor; spatial scope;
multi-source data; Ethnic minority cultural
exchange index
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3974/geodp.2023.01.04
CSTR: https://cstr.escience.org.cn/CSTR:20146.14.2023.01.04
Dataset Availability Statement:
The dataset supporting this paper
was published and is accessible through the Digital Journal of Global Change Data Repository
at: https://doi.org/10.3974/geodb.2023.02.09.V1
or https://cstr.escience.org.cn/CSTR:20146.11.2023.02.09.V1.
1 Introduction
The
Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor is an ethnographic concept referrings to the migration
corridor of the Zang-Qiang-Yi system in western China, which is dominated by
the ancestors of many ethnic groups from the Zang-Qiang-Yi system, running
through the great northwest and southwest of China[1]. In
1978, Mr. FEI Xiaotong proposed the concept of ??Tibetan-Yi corridor??, which
scholars have enriched to ??Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor?? in recent years, considering
the important historical position of Qiang people in the region[2–4]. The region is dominated by high mountains and valleys, with many
layers of mountains and rivers flowing, and is one of the most complex and
diverse natural ecological regions in China. The frequent migratory flows and
extensive cultural exchanges of many ethnic groups since the pre-Qin dynasty
have made the cultural complexity and diversity of this region outstanding[5], and it is one of the five important ethnic corridors in China[6]. The Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor is a vivid portrayal of the pluralistic
pattern of the Chinese nation, and the in-depth study of the ??Zang-Qiang-Yi
corridor?? is of great importance for promoting the construction of the common
spiritual home of the Chinese nation and cultural self-confidence and self-
improvement.
In-depth research
is necessary to clarify the spatial scope of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor. Although
most scholars use the corridor in the Six Rivers basin and the Hengduan
Mountains as the spatial scope of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor[7,8], many inconsistencies are observed between these scopes and the
Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor in terms of ethnic and cultural concepts[1]. The Zang-Qiang-Yi cultural industry corridor, delineated by the
Ministry of Culture, Sichuan province, and relevant cities and states, considers
administrative divisions and industrial bases, and belongs to the concept of
economic zones. Therefore, the lack of a clear definition of the spatial scope
of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor, the failure to consider the natural geographical
conditions and human characteristics, and the lack of refinement to the county
level, make it difficult to guide the formulation of relevant ethnic cultural
development policies.
This paper
constructs the ethnic minority cultural exchange index based
on multiple sources of geographic, ethnic, and cultural data, integrates
physical geography and human characteristics, and uses county-level
administrative districts as the basic unit to identify the spatial scope of the
??Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor?? through threshold selection. Thus, the Boundary data
of Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor is developed. This dataset can provide necessary
data support for ethnographic and sociological research and policy formulation related
to ethnic and cultural development in the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor.
2 Metadata of the Dataset
The metadata of the boundary data of Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor[9]
is summarized in Table 1. It includes the dataset full name, short name,
authors, year of publication, spatial resolution, data format, data size, data
files, data publisher, and data sharing
policy, etc.
3 Methods
3.1 Data Sources
The data used in this study were
obtained from three sources: basic geographic information, ethnic population
census, and intangible cultural heritage (ICH) flow distribution. The basic
geographic information data, which included the extent of the Hengduan
Mountains, the extent of the six river basins, and county-level administrative
divisions, were obtained from the Resource and Environment Science and Data
Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The ethnic population census data,
mainly the percentage of minority populations,
Table
1 Metadata summary of the Boundary
data of Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor
Items
|
Description
|
Dataset full name
|
Boundary data of Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor
|
Dataset short
name
|
Zang-Qiang-Yi_Corridor
|
Authors
|
Xing, L. G.
HLX-0489-2023, College of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu
University of Technology, ruger_xing@sina.com
Zhang, Y.
HMP-0644-2023, College of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu
University of Technology, zhangyang2020@cdut.edu.cn
Kan, A. K.
HMP-0479-2023, College of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu
University of Technology, kanaike@cdut.edu.cn
Dai, H.
HMO-9742-2023, College of Earth Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology,
3043677058@qq.com
Cheng, J. L.
HMP-1606-2023, College of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu
University of Technology, 2320483087@qq.com
Chen, Y.
HMO-9810-2023, College of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu
University of Technology, 167375548@qq.com
Liu, T.
HMO-9750-2023, College of Earth Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology,
625692182@qq.com
|
Geographical region
|
21??08??N-36??16??N, 91??41??E-105??19??E, including Guizhou
province, Qinghai province, Sichuan province, Xizang autonomous region, part
of the county-level administrative regions of Yunnan province
|
Year
|
2021
|
Spatial
resolution
|
county
|
Data format
|
.shp, .xlsx
|
Data size
|
4.05 MB (2.54 MB
after compression)
|
Data files
|
(1) boundary data
of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor; (2) statistics of the proportion of minority
population, intangible cultural heritage distribution and ethnic minority cultural exchange index in each county
|
Data publisher
|
Global Change Research Data Publishing & Repository,
http://www.geodoi.ac.cn
|
Address
|
No. 11A, Datun
Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China
|
Data sharing
policy
|
Data from the Global
Change Research Data Publishing & Repository includes metadata, datasets (in the Digital Journal of Global Change Data Repository), and
publications (in the Journal of Global Change Data & Discovery). Data sharing policy includes: (1) Data are openly
available and can be free downloaded via the Internet; (2) End users are
encouraged to use Data subject to citation; (3) Users, who are by definition
also value-added service providers, are welcome to redistribute Data
subject to written permission from the GCdataPR Editorial Office and the
issuance of a Data redistribution license; and (4) If Data are used to
compile new datasets, the ??ten per cent principal?? should be followed such
that Data records utilized should not surpass 10% of the new
dataset contents, while sources should be clearly noted in suitable places in
the new dataset[10]
|
Communication and searchable system
|
DOI, CSTR, Crossref, DCI, CSCD, CNKI,
SciEngine, WDS/ISC, GEOSS
|
were
obtained from the 2020 China Population Census Subcounty Information. The ICH
flow distribution data were obtained from the spatial distribution data set of
five batches of national ICH in China The ICH distribution data were mainly
based on the ICH lists in[11], and the frequency of ICH
distribution in each county-level[12] administrative
region was obtained by querying its distribution range on the China ICH website.
3.2 Methodology
The
spatial scope of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor was determined by referring to the
spatial scope of the Six Rivers basin and the Hengduan Mountains and a review
of related literature to identify the county-level administrative regions
involved in the physical geography of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor[13]. To quantitatively measure the core human characteristics of the
Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor as a region with extensive minority cultural exchange,
this study constructed the ethnic minority cultural exchange index (EMCEI) as a key indicator to define its
spatial scope, calculated as
(1)
where
Pi and Ni are the proportion of minority population and the frequency of ICH
distribution in county-level administrative region i, respectively. For
county-level administrative region i
within the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor, the proportion of minority population is
higher than that of the whole country and at least one ICH dissemination is
observed, that is, , .
3.3 Technology Route
The
data development process for this study (Figure 1) involved three main steps.
First, a preliminary selection was made for the county-level administrative
districts involved in the physical geography of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor
based on the 2021 county-level administrative divisions of China, the scope of
the Hengduan Mountains, and the scope of the Six River basin. The
ethnic
minority cultural exchange index of each county-level
administrative district in the preliminary selection area was then calculated
by using the percentage of minority population and the frequency of ICH flow in
2020 by county. Finally, the range of values and relevant literature were
combined to define the spatial scope of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor with
reasonable thresholds.
Figure
1 Flowchart of the dataset
development
4 Data Results and Validation
4.1 Data Composition
The
research obtained three sets of spatial data files (.shp format) and 1
statistical data table (.xlsx format). The three sets of spatial data files were
boundary data of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor, boundary data of the Liujiang
River basin, and boundary data of the Hengduan Mountains. The statistical data
table included the proportion of ethnic minority population in the counties
(cities) of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor, the data of the distribution of ICH,
and the ethnic minority cultural exchange index data. Although
the data of the Liujiang River basin and Hengduan Mountains are correct, they
are irrelevant to the ultimate purpose of the study. Therefore, only the
boundary data and statistical data tables of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor were
retained in the final dataset, which will be published later.
4.2 Data Products
The
Six Rivers basin involves 33 cities and states in Sichuan, Yunnan, Qinghai, and
Xizang autonomous regions, including 228 county-level administrative districts,
covering all county-level administrative districts involved in the Hengduan
Mountains. Therefore, the natural geographical area of the Zang-Qiang-Yi
corridor is the area of the Six Rivers basin, which is also the primary area
for the ethnic minority cultural exchange index calculation in this study (Figures 2 and 3). In this region, the
population ratio of ethnic minorities is spatially distributed with high values
in the northwest and low values in the southeast, and its boundary is
relatively consistent with the HU Huanyong line (Figure 4). The frequency of ICH
distribution is characterized by high value areas and low value areas,
reflecting the diversity and complexity of culture in this region (Figure 5).
The high value area of the ethnic minority cultural exchange index is relatively consistent with the range of the Hengduan Mountains,
whereas the areas downstream of major rivers, such as the Jinsha and Min
rivers, which are dominated by Han culture (e.g., most of the districts and
counties under Chengdu, Meishan, and Yibin), are low value areas (Figure 6).
The scope of the
Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor was identified by using 0.2 as the threshold of ethnic minority cultural exchange index and combining the requirement of spatial distribution contiguity
(Figure 7). This range includes 161 county-level administrative regions,
involving 25 cities and states in Sichuan, Yunnan, Guizhou, Xizang autonomous
region, and Qinghai provinces (Table 2).
4.3 Data Validation
Comparing
the scope of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor identified in this study with the scope
of the Zang-Qiang-Yi cultural industry corridor in the published ??Zang-Qiang-Yi
cultural industry corridor master plan??, the major cities and states involved
are more consistent with the core areas in the ??Zang-Qiang-Yi cultural industry
corridor master plan??. Considering that the scope of the Zang-Qiang-Yi cultural
industry corridor master plan focuses more on the development conditions of
cultural industries and the smallest delineated unit is the city and state, the
scope of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor identified in this study can be considered
more scientific and reasonable.
|
|
Figure
2 Map of
transverse mountain area involving county-level administrative regions
|
Figure 3 Map of six river basins involving
county-level administrative
districts
|
|
|
Figure 4 Map of percentage of minority
population in primary districts
|
Figure 5 Map of frequency of intangible cultural
heritage flow in primary districts
|
|
|
Figure 6 Map of cultural exchange index
for primary election districts
|
Figure 7 Map of spatial scope of the
Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor
|
Table
2 County-level
administrative regions within the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor
Province (Autonomous region)
|
City (State)
|
County (City-level, District)
|
Sichuan province
|
Aba Zang and Qiang autonomous prefecture
|
Aba , Heishui , Hongyuan , Jinchuan, Jiuzhaigou,
Lixian, Maerkang, Maoxian, Rangtang, Ruoergai, Songpan, Wenchuan, Xiaojin
|
|
Ganze Zang autonomous prefecture
|
Batang, Baiyu, Danba, Daofu, Daocheng, Derong,
Dege, Ganzi, Jiulong, Kangding, Litang, Luhuo, Luding, Seda, Shiqu,
Xiangcheng, Xinlong, Yajiang
|
|
Leshan
|
Ebian Yi autonomous county, Mabian Yi autonomous
county
|
|
Liangshan Yi autonomous prefecture
|
Butu, Dechang, Ganluo, Huili, Jinyang, Leibo,
Meigu, Mianning, Muli Zang autonomous county, Ningnan, Puge, Xichang, Xide,
Yanyuan, Yuexi, Zhaojue
|
|
Mianyang
|
Beichuan Qiang autonomous county
|
|
Panzhihua
|
Dongqu, Miyi, Renhe, Xiqu, Yanbian
|
|
Yaan
|
Baoxing, Shimian
|
Yunnan province
|
Baoshan
|
Changning, Longyang
|
|
Chuxiong Yi autonomous prefecture
|
Chuxiong, Dayao, Lufeng, Muding, Nanhua, Wuding,
Yaoan, Yongren, Yuanmou
|
|
Dali Bai autonomous prefecture
|
Binchuan, Dali, Eryuan, Heqing, Jianchuan, Midu,
Nanjian Yi autonomous county, Weishan Yi-Hui autonomous county, Xiangyun,
Yangbi Yi autonomous county, Yongping, Yunlong
|
|
Diqing Zang autonomous prefecture
|
Deqin, Weixi Lisu autonomous county, Shangri-La
|
(To be continued on the next page)
(Continued)
Province (Autonomous region)
|
City (State)
|
County (City, District)
|
Yunnan province
|
Kunming
|
Anning, Chenggong, Fumin,
Guandu, Jinning, Luquan Yi-Miao autonomous county, Panlong, Songming, Wuhua,
Xishan, Xundian Hui-Yi autonomous county, Yiliang
|
|
Lijiang
|
Gucheng, Huaping, Ninglang
Yi autonomous county, Yongsheng, Yulong Naxi autonomous county
|
|
Lincang
|
Cangyuan Wa autonomous county,
Fengqing, Gengma Dai-Wa autonomous county, linxiang,
Shuangjiang Lahu-Wa-Bulang- Dai autonomous county, Yongde,
Yunxian, Zhenkang
|
|
Nujiang Lisu autonomous prefecture
|
Fugong, Gongshan Dulong-Nu
autonomous county, Lanping Bai-Pumi autonomous county, Lushui
|
|
Pu??er
|
Jiangcheng Hani-Yi autonomous county,
Jingdong Yi autonomous county, Jinggu Dai-Yi autonomous county,
Lancang Lahu autonomous county, Menglian Dai-Lahu-Wa autonomous county,
Ninger Hani-Yi autonomous county, Simao, Ximeng Wa
autonomous county, Zhenyuan Yi-Hani-Lahu autonomous county
|
|
Xishuangbanna Dai autonomous prefecture
|
Jinghong, Menghai, Mengla
|
|
Yuxi
|
Chengjiang, Hongta, Yimen
|
|
Zhaotong
|
Ludian, Weixin, Yiliang,
Zhaoyang
|
Guizhou province
|
Bijie
|
Hezhang
|
Xizang autonomous region
|
Qamdo
|
Baxoi, Banbar, Chagyab,
Dengqen, Konjo, Jomda, Karub, Riwoqe, Lhorong, Markam, Zogang
|
|
Nyingchi
|
Bome, Zayu
|
|
Naqu
|
Amdo, Baqen, Biru, Lhari,
Nyainrong, Seni, Sog
|
Qinghai province
|
Guoluo Tibetan autonomous
prefecture
|
Banma, Dari, Jiuzhi, Maduo
|
|
Haixi Mongol-Tibetan autonomous
prefecture
|
Golmud
|
|
Yushu Tibetan autonomous
prefecture
|
Chengduo, Baoqian, Yushu,
Zaduo, Zhiduo
|
5 Discussion and Conclusion
The
Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor is an important ethnic cultural area in southwest China,
but its spatial scope definition is still controversial in academic circles.
This study considers the physical geographic conditions and human
characteristics of the region, and based on multiple sources of data, such as
basic geographic information, ICH distribution, and national population census.
The spatial scope of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor is identified by constructing
the ethnic minority cultural exchange index and
setting thresholds on the basis of the initial selection of the physical
geographic scope. The identified Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor includes 162 county-level
administrative regions, involving 25 cities and states in Sichuan, Yunnan,
Guizhou, Xizang autonomous region, and Qinghai provinces, which is more
consistent with the scope of the core area of the Zang-Qiang-Yi cultural
industry corridor in the Zang-Qiang-Yi cultural industry corridor master plan.
This study is an exploration of the application of integrating multisource data
for ethnographic and sociological research, and innovatively constructs the ethnic minority
cultural exchange index, which has certain implications
for related research. The developed spatial scope dataset of the Zang-Qiang-Yi
corridor can provide necessary basic data for the research on the Zang-Qiang-Yi
corridor and support the formulation of policies related to cultural industries
in the region.
However, the
Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor is dynamic in nature, and the scope identified in this
study is the current spatial boundary obtained by taking county-level
administrative districts as the basic division unit. In addition, the
ethnic
minority cultural exchange index constructed in this study
only considers the proportion of minority populations and the frequency of ICH
distribution, Future research can further enrich the spatial scope
identification and zoning research results of the Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor by
including more humanistic elements, such as major ancient road (channel)
networks, language (dialect) areas, traditional villages, and archaeological
relics.
Author Contributions
Zhang, Y. and Kan, A. K. did the overall design of
the dataset development; Cheng, J. L. and Liu, T. collected and processed the
source data; Dai, H. and Chen, Y designed the model and algorithm; Dai, H. and
Xing, L. G. did the data validation; Xing, L. G., et al. wrote the data paper.
Conflicts
of Interest
The authors
declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1]
Xu,
X. S. The concept of ??Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor?? and its definition [J]. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Humanities and Social Science), 2016,
37(7): 9–13.
[2]
Fei,
X. T. On the identification of ethnic groups in China [J]. Social Sciences in China, 1980, (1): 147–162.
[3]
Li,
S. M. The study of ??Tibetan-Yi corridor?? and the doctrine of ethnic corridor
[J]. Journal of Tibetology, 2005(2):
2–7.
[4]
Shi,
S. Three perspectives and research ideas on understanding the Tibetan-Yi
corridor [J]. Journal of Guangxi
University for Nationalities (Philosophy
and Social Science Edition), 2008, 30(6): 29–34.
[5]
Shi,
S. A review of the study on the origin of Zang and Burmese languages in the
Tibetan-Yi corridor [J]. Thinking,
2008(2): 15–19.
[6]
Li,
X. X. On the ??National corridor?? and the pattern of ??two vertical and three
horizontal?? [J]. Journal of Chinese
Culture, 2005(3): 124–130.
[7]
Zhang,
X. The research path of Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor [J]. Northwestern Journal of Ethnology, 2012(3): 188–197.
[8]
Shi,
S. The ??Tibetan-Yi corridor??: A unique value of ethnic regions: a discussion on
the concept and region of ??Tibetan-Yi corridor?? proposed by Mr. Fei Xiaotong
[J]. Journal of Tibetology, 2005(00):
8–17.
[9]
Xing,
L. G., Zhang, Y., Kan, A. K., et al.
Boundary data of Zang-Qiang-Yi corridor [J/DB/OL]. Digital Journal of Global Change Data Repository, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3974/geodb.2023.02.09.V1.
https://cstr.escience.org.cn/CSTR:20146.11.2023.02.09.V1.
[10]
GCdataPR
Editorial Office. GCdataPR data sharing policy [OL].
https://doi.org/10.3974/dp.policy.2014.05 (Updated 2017).
[11]
Guo,
Y., Yan, J. Y., Wang, Z. B., et al.
Spatial distribution data set of 3610 national intangible cultural heritages in
five batches in China [J/DB/OL]. Digital
Journal of Global Change Data Repository, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3974/geodb.2021.12.01.V1.
https://cstr.escience.org.cn/CSTR:20146.11.2021.12.01.V1.
[12]
Li,
J. X., Wang, Z. B. Study on the spatial distribution and genealogical dating of
national-level non-heritage items [J]. Acta
Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(12): 3162–3179.
[13]
Shi,
Z. Q., Deng, W., Zhang, S. Y. Study on the spatial pattern and spatio-temporal
changes of the national land in the Hengduan Mountains in the past 25 years
[J]. Geographical Research, 2018,
37(3): 607–621.