Time Series Dataset of Land Use/Cover Change in the
Jingchuan Basin
Wang, R.1, 3 Wang, Y. Q.2* Hu, L. B.1
1. College of Resources and
Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal University, Tianshui 741001, China;
2. Chinese Land Surveying and
Planning Institute, Beijing 100035, China;
3. Faculty of Geomatics,
Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China
Abstract: The Jingchuan basin
refers to the river catchment area above Jingchuan county of the upper reaches
of the Jing river, which is the largest tributary of the Wei river. The land
use classification system of the Jingchuan basin consists of six first-level
categories and 14 second-level categories. The first-level categories include
forest land, grass land, wetland, cultivated land, artificial surface, and bare
land. On the basis of multitemporal Landsat MSS/TM/OLI series images from 1976
to 2015 and platforms of eCognition and ENVI, a time series dataset (1976-2015) of land use change in the Jingchuan basin was extracted
using the methods of decision tree classification and object-oriented
information extraction based on knowledge rule sets. The datasets include (1)
Jingchuan basin boundary data; (2) land use spatial distribution dataset of ten
periods from 1976 to 2015 (including 1976, 1991, 1995, 2000, 2003, 2007, 2010,
2013, and 2015), the spatial resolution of which in 1976 was 60 m, 15 m in 2013
and 2015, and 30 m in other years; (3) land use change dataset during 1976-1991, 1991-2000, and 2000-2015 periods, the resolution of the latter is 15 m, and the
resolution of the former two phases is 30 m. The datasets are archived in the
format of .shp or .tif, and comprise 73 files with 252 MB (compressed into two
files with 6.83 MB data size).
Keywords: Jingchuan baisn; land use/cover; 1976-2015; Yellow River
basin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3974/geodp.2022.01.14
CSTR:
https://cstr.escience.org.cn/CSTR:20146.14.2022.01.14
Dataset Availability Statement:
The dataset
supporting this paper was published and is accessible through the Digital Journal of Global
Change Data Repository at: https://doi.org/10.3974/geodb.2021.09.03.V1 or https://cstr.escience.org.cn/CSTR:20146.11.2022.09.03.V1.
1 Introduction
The
Jing river is the first tributary of Wei river, which rises in the eastern foot
of the Liupan Mountain and is located at 106??14¢E-108??42¢E, 34??46¢N-37??19¢N, in the northwest part of the Loess
Plateau. It runs through Shaanxi, Gansu and Ningxia provinces and finally flows
into the Wei river. The Jingchuan basin has good irrigation conditions,
developed agriculture and great potential for economic development, all of
which make it a grain-producing area in northwest china[1]. However,
the terrain is fragmented, vegetation coverage is low, forestland and grassland
only account for 10% of the total area of the basin, and soil erosion is
serious. Thus, it was listed as one of the first demonstration areas of the
returning farmland to forestland and grassland project in China in 2000. It was
also listed as a new round of poverty alleviation projects to return farmland
to forestland in 2014[2]. The Jingchuan basin refers to the river catchment area upstream of the Jingchuan hydrologic station,
located in the southwest of the Jing river basin with the terrain high in the
west and low in the east. It belongs to the semi-humid transitional zone with
the characteristics of warm temperate climate and mountain climates on the
Loess Plateau[3]. According to the observation data of Pingliang
meteorological station, the annual average temperature is 8.9 ??C, and the annual precipitation
is 355-845 mm. The precipitation in summer is
more than that in the Jingchuan basin, and the interannual variation of
precipitation is significant. In recent years, China has carried out
large-scale ecological restoration projects in the Yellow River basin; changes
in land use patterns, such as returning farmland to forestland and restricting
arbitrary mining and exploitation, have led to great changes in land use in the
Jing river basin[4,5], resulting in corresponding changes in its
ecosystem structure.
Therefore, based
on the American Landsat MSS/TM/OLI series remote sensing images, long time
series datasets of land use distribution and their changes in the Jingchuan basin
from 1976 to 2015 were extracted using decision tree classification and
object-oriented information extraction based on knowledge rule set with visual
interpretation. The regional characteristics of the Jingchuan basin were
considered, and the land use /cover classification system[6] of
ecological decade environmental remote sensing were referred to. The accuracy of land use datasets were validated
using high resolution Google images, field sampling point data and the existing
ecological decade dataset (2010) to comprehensively understand the land use
types and their dynamic trends in the Jingchuan basin. Such validation can
provide data support for the evaluation of ecological services and the
formulation of guidelines and policies for the sustainable development of the
basin, and serve as a scientific basis for the ecological protection and
high-quality development of the Yellow River basin.
2 Metadata of the
Dataset
The
metadata of Time series land use/cover change dataset in Jingchuan basin (1976-2015)[7] is summarized in Table 1. It includes the
dataset full name, short name, authors, year of the dataset, temporal
resolution, spatial resolution, data format, data size, data files, data
publisher, and data sharing policy, etc.
3 Methods
3.1 Data Sources
Landsat MSS/TM/OLI
series images which were used in the production of datasets in this study, were
taken from USGS. According to the requirements of land use interpretation and
the cloud coverage and quality of images in the study area, 21 images of 10
periods were obtained. Table 2 shows the sensor, data time, spatial resolution
and column-number-mode. The ecological decade data (2010) of 30 m spatial
resolution were collected from a Chinese ecosystem survey and assessment. The
DEM with a 30-m spatial solution for the field survey was obtained from USGS.
The monthly meteorological data of the Pingliang station in the Jingchuan basin
were derived from the monthly dataset of China surface data of the National
Scientific Meteorological Center.
Table 1 Metadata summary of the Time
series land use/cover change dataset in Jingchuan basin (1976-2015)
Items
|
Description
|
Dataset full name
|
Time series land
use/cover change dataset in Jingchuan basin (1976-2015)
|
Dataset short
name
|
LanduseJingChuanBasin_1976-2015
|
Authors
|
Wang, R.
0000-0001-5497-3447, Tianshui Normal university, 0119061@stu.lzjtu.edu.cn
Wang, Y. Q. 0000-0002-1791-3741,
Chinese Land Surveying and Planning Institute, freefly_99@126.com
Hu, L. B. 0000-0002-1265-5309, Tianshui Normal
university, 398361732@qq.com
|
Geographical region
|
Jingchuan basin
|
Year
|
1976, 1991, 1995,
2000, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2015
|
Temporal
resolution
|
Year
|
Spatial
resolution
|
60 m??60m in1976;
30 m??30m in 1991, 1995, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2007, and 2010; 15 m??15m in 2013
and 2015
|
Data format
|
Jingchuan basin
boundary data, .shp; land use/cover types and their dynamic change data, .tif
|
Data size
|
252 MB
|
Foundations
|
School-listed
Innovation Foundation of Tianshui Normal university in 2020 (CXJ2020-14);
Higher Education Innovation Ability Promotion Project of Gansu Provincial
Education Department in 2019 (2019B-134)
|
Data publisher
|
Global Change Research Data Publishing & Repository,
http://www.geodoi.ac.cn
|
Address
|
No. 11A, Datun
Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China
|
Data sharing
policy
|
Data from the Global
Change Research Data Publishing & Repository includes metadata, datasets (in the Digital Journal of Global Change Data Repository), and
publications (in the Journal of Global Change Data & Discovery). Data sharing policy includes: (1) Data are openly
available and can be free downloaded via the Internet; (2) End users are
encouraged to use Data subject to citation; (3) Users, who are by definition
also value-added service providers, are welcome to redistribute Data
subject to written permission from the GCdataPR Editorial Office and the
issuance of a Data redistribution license; and (4) If Data are used to
compile new datasets, the ??ten per cent principal?? should be followed such
that Data records utilized should not surpass 10% of the new dataset
contents, while sources should be clearly noted in suitable places in the new
dataset[7]
|
Communication and searchable system
|
DOI, CSTR, Crossref,
DCI, CSCD, CNKI, SciEngine, WDS/ISC, GEOSS
|
3.2 Research and Development Processing
Taking the land cover classification system
of the Ecological Environment Remote Sensing Monitoring Annual Reports in the
past decade as references, the land use classification system was formulated.
Considering the regional characteristics of the Jingchuan basin, the evergreen
broad-leaved forest, evergreen broad-leaved shrub and evergreen coniferous
shrub
and
tree were excluded from the secondary forest classification. No wetlands or lakes are found in the Jingchuan
basin; thus, only reservoirs/pits and rivers were reserved in the secondary
wetland classification. Table 3 presents the classification system and codes of
land use/cover in the Jingchuan basin. On the basis of the Landsat MSS/TM/OLI
series images, land use information was extracted through decision tree
classification and objected-oriented multiresolution segmentation, combined
with DEM and its derived slope data. Doing so determined the interpretation
marker on the basis of object classes and established corresponding rules. The
object-oriented information extraction results were further processed through
visual interpretation. To analyze the land use types and the corresponding
dynamic change trends, the accuracy was validated and evaluated using Google
Earth high-resolution remote sensing images, field sampling data and ecological
decade data (2010). Figure 2 illustrates the R&D technical flow chart.
Table
2 Data sources of Land use/cover time
series dataset of the Jinchuan basin (1976-2015) products
Year
|
Sensor
|
Data time
|
Spatial resolution
|
Row and path
|
1976
|
MSS
|
1976-6-10
|
60 m
|
138035/138036
|
1991
|
TM
|
1991-8-23,
1991-8-30
|
30 m
|
128035/129035
|
1995
|
TM
|
1995-8-18,
1995-8-25
|
30 m
|
128035/129035
|
2000
|
TM
|
2000-4-16,
2000-7-30
|
30 m
|
128035/129035
|
2003
|
TM
|
2003-6-6,
2003-6-5
|
30 m
|
128035/129035
|
2005
|
TM
|
2003-8-15,
2005-7-12, 2005-10-7
|
30 m
|
128035/129035
|
2007
|
TM
|
2007-5-6,
2007-8-3, 2007-9-20
|
30 m
|
128035/129035
|
2010
|
TM
|
2010-4-28,
2010-5-23
|
30 m
|
128035/129035
|
2013
|
OLI
|
2013-10-6,
2013-11-14
|
15 m
|
128035/129035
|
2015
|
OLI
|
2015-5-12,
2015-7-24
|
15 m
|
128035/129035
|
Figure 1 Field
sampling and spatial distribution of samples
Table
3 Classification system used for the
dataset
Level?? classification and code
|
Level ??\?? classification and code
|
Level ?? classification and code
|
Level ??\?? classification and code
|
1 Forest
|
101 Broadleaved deciduous forest
|
3 Wetland
|
32 River
|
102 Evergreen
coniferous forest
|
4 Cultivated land
|
41 Dryland
|
103 Deciduous
coniferous forest
|
5 Artificial surface
|
51 Residence
|
104 Coniferous
and broad-leaved mixed forest
|
52 Industrial land
|
105 Deciduous
broad-leaved bush
|
53 Transportation
|
2 Grass land
|
21 Grass
land
|
54 Stope
|
3 Wetland
|
31
Reservoir/Pit
|
6 Others
|
61 Bare land
|
Figure 2 Research and
development technical flow chart
4 Data Results and Validation
4.1 Data Composition
The
land use/cover time series dataset of the Jingchuan basin (1976?C2015) has 73 data files, which
include the land use/cover distribution dataset, land use/cover change dataset
and Jingchuan basin boundary dataset. The data are as follows:
(1) The land
use/cover distribution dataset includes 10 periods of land use/cover type
distribution data in 1976, 1991, 1995, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2010, 2013 and
2015 (Figure 2) in .tif format; the temporal resolution is year, and the
spatial resolution was 60 m ?? 60 m in 1976; 30 m ?? 30 m in 1991, 1995, 2000,
2003, 2005, 2007 and 2010; 15 m ?? 15 m in 2013 and 2015. It is labelled ??LandCover_JingchuanBasin_year.tif??
where the grid value represents the land use/cover type code, as shown in Table
3 (e.g., the grid value ??41?? represents ??dryland??).
(2) The land
use/cover change dataset comprises three periods (i.e., 1976?C1991, 1991?C2000 and 2000?C2005) of
land use/cover change dataset (Figure 4) in.tif format; the temporal resolution
is 16, 10 and 16 years, respectively; the spatial resolution was 30 m ?? 30 m in
1976?C1991 and
1991?C2000 and
15 m ?? 15 m in 2000?C2015. It is named ??LandCoverChange_JingchuanBasin_start
year_end year.tif?? (e.g., the land use/cover change data from 1976 to
1991 are labelled as LandCoverChange_JingchuanBasin_1976_1991.tif where the
grid value represents the change of land use/cover types; ??4121?? indicates that
the land use type changes from ??dryland (41)?? to ??grassland (21)??).
(3) The Jingchuan basin boundary dataset
has a scale of 1:50000 in .tif format, and the file was labelled ??Jingchuan
Basin_Boundary.shp??.
4.2 Data Results
4.2.1 Land Use of the Jingchuan Basin from 1976 to 2015
Figure 3 shows the
land use information extraction results of ten periods from 1976 to 2015.
Figure 3 Spatial
distribution of ten periods land use classification dataset from 1976 to 2015
Table 4 Statistics
of land use area in the Jingchuan basin from 1976 to 2015 (Area unit: km2)
Land use
types
|
Year
|
1976
|
1991
|
1995
|
2000
|
2003
|
2005
|
2007
|
2010
|
2013
|
2015
|
X1
|
12.51
|
42.19
|
50.85
|
71.82
|
71.69
|
79.69
|
82.20
|
87.94
|
94.58
|
95.32
|
X2
|
15.03
|
17.29
|
18.11
|
18.19
|
22.68
|
22.62
|
22.61
|
22.93
|
22.80
|
22.83
|
X3
|
1,776.95
|
1,929.14
|
1,892.25
|
1,594.63
|
1,565.87
|
1,522.03
|
1,345.47
|
1,264.61
|
1,187.54
|
1,124.85
|
X4
|
43.20
|
32.12
|
27.20
|
29.32
|
20.78
|
24.55
|
20.83
|
20.67
|
18.49
|
21.28
|
X5
|
653.94
|
469.14
|
498.37
|
731.18
|
703.47
|
725.50
|
889.07
|
919.10
|
917.89
|
899.38
|
X6
|
153.76
|
152.37
|
162.16
|
164.61
|
161.77
|
161.37
|
160.73
|
163.70
|
166.30
|
166.59
|
X7
|
309.30
|
293.83
|
291.76
|
328.07
|
387.07
|
395.34
|
406.49
|
442.96
|
510.82
|
562.50
|
X8
|
1.80
|
0.21
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
19.62
|
X9
|
180.46
|
194.01
|
186.67
|
188.25
|
191.34
|
192.08
|
191.77
|
194.27
|
195.80
|
195.77
|
X10
|
0.92
|
9.22
|
10.84
|
10.62
|
11.30
|
12.38
|
14.47
|
16.23
|
16.89
|
17.13
|
X11
|
?C
|
0.89
|
0.89
|
1.05
|
0.84
|
0.99
|
1.81
|
1.17
|
1.17
|
1.71
|
X12
|
4.13
|
12.41
|
13.70
|
13.66
|
13.74
|
13.75
|
13.76
|
13.88
|
13.86
|
13.83
|
X13
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
1.13
|
1.30
|
1.66
|
2.05
|
2.84
|
2.42
|
6.89
|
X14
|
?C
|
0.01
|
0.05
|
0.06
|
0.84
|
0.71
|
1.42
|
2.40
|
3.61
|
4.56
|
Notes: Residence
(X1), Evergreen
coniferous forest (X2), Dryland (X3), River (X4), Grass
land (X5),
Broadleaved deciduous forest (X6), Deciduous broad-leaved bush (X7),
Bare land (X8),
Coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest (X9), Transportation
(X10),
Reservoir/Pit (X11),
Deciduous coniferous forest (X12), Industrial land (X13),
Stope (X14), and
??‒??represent
that there is no conversion between the two types of land use.
Figure 3 shows that the land use types were relatively
single in 1976 and have tended to be stable since 1991. The grassland and
residential areas have significantly increased through the years. Coniferous
and broad-leaved mixed forests, deciduous broad-leaved bushes and broad-leaved
deciduous forests were mainly distributed in high altitudes. The residence was
mainly distributed at the sources of the Xie river and Houxia river and the
valley on both sides of the Jing river. Since 2003, the area of stope has
gradually expanded, which is mainly distributed in the rock mining areas in the
southern Kongtong district of Pingliang. Industrial land is mainly distributed
in the industrial park on the south side of the Jing river in the middle of the
Kongtong district. The main reservoir is Wolongshan reservoir in Jingchuan county.
As presented in Table 4, the dryland area decreased by 647.10 km2 from 1976 to 2015, but the areas of
grassland and deciduous broad-leaved shrub increased year by year, that is,
245.44 and 252.19 km2, respectively. Except for the average annual
expansion rate of residential areas, which was 2.12 km2/a that
reached the maximum in 1991, areas of other human activities, such as
transportation, industrial land, stope and reservoir/pit, increased year by
year from 1991 to 2015. The increased area of transportation has reached
17.13 km2, 18.62 times of 1976, the largest amongst the areas
of human activities.
4.2.2 Dynamic Change of Land Use in the
Jingchuan Basin from 1976 to 2015
Figure
4 shows land use dynamic changes during 1976-1991, 1991-2000, and
2000-2015 periods, and corresponding
transfer matrixes are shown as Table 5-7.
Table 5 Dynamic
transfer matrix of land use from 1976 to 1991 (Area
unit: km2)
Types before
transfer
|
Land use/cover types after transfer
|
Sum
|
X1
|
X2
|
X3
|
X4
|
X5
|
X6
|
X7
|
X9
|
X10
|
X11
|
X12
|
X1
|
?C
|
?C
|
1.81
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.03
|
?C
|
?C
|
1.84
|
X2
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.04
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
--
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.04
|
X3
|
19.05
|
?C
|
?C
|
2.32
|
1.41
|
1.40
|
5.42
|
?C
|
4.89
|
?C
|
?C
|
15.44
|
X4
|
0.10
|
|
10.73
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.08
|
0.25
|
?C
|
11.06
|
X5
|
0.16
|
0.88
|
146.78
|
?C
|
?C
|
2.89
|
11.86
|
5.20
|
0.24
|
?C
|
3.22
|
170.19
|
X6
|
?C
|
0.12
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.81
|
6.88
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.19
|
7.88
|
X7
|
?C
|
?C
|
19.82
|
?C
|
2.64
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.85
|
?C
|
0.28
|
2.76
|
27.59
|
X8
|
?C
|
?C
|
1.19
|
0.15
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
1.34
|
X9
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.07
|
0.31
|
0.04
|
?C
|
0.06
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.48
|
Sum
|
19.31
|
1.00
|
178.52
|
2.47
|
4.12
|
5.84
|
18.13
|
12.93
|
5.27
|
0.53
|
6.17
|
233.98
|
Notes: Residence (X1), Evergreen
coniferous forest (X2), Dryland (X3), River (X4), Grass
land (X5),
Broadleaved deciduous forest (X6), Deciduous broad-leaved bush (X7),
Bare land (X8),
Coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest (X9), Transportation
(X10),
Reservoir/Pit (X11),
Deciduous coniferous forest (X12), and ??‒?? represent that
there is no conversion between the two types of land use.
In summary, a
large amount of grassland was reclaimed in the Jingchuan basin to increase the
acreage of dryland from 1976 to 1991. At this stage, residence, industrial land
and transportation were the main types of human activity. The total area of
human activity land converted from other land use types was 24.58 km2,
which was mainly converted into residential and transportation lands. However,
the total area of human activity land converted to other land use types was
only 3.20 km2. As shown in Figure 4b and Table 6, the area of
conversion from dryland to another land use type was the largest from 1991 to
2000, which was 363.93 km2, and it was mainly distributed in middle
and low altitude areas. The area converted from dryland to grassland was the
largest, which is 301.23 km2, followed by areas that were converted
from grassland to dryland and from dryland to deciduous broad-leaved bushes,
which were 37.99 and 32.13 km2, respectively. Therefore, grassland was reclaimed for cultivated land from 1991
to 2000; meanwhile, large areas of cultivated land were converted to grassland
and forestland in the Jingchuan basin. In this phase, the land use types of
human activities were diverse, including residence, transportation, slope and
industrial land. The area that was converted into human activity land was 27.44
km2, most of which were converted into residential and
transportation. Compared with the former, the area of human activity land that
was changed into another land use type was only 1.43 km2. That is,
compared with the previous phase, the area of human activity land increased by
26.01 km2.
Figure 4 Visualization
of land use dynamic changes in three phase during1976-2015
|
Figure 4c and Table 7 illustrate that
similar to the trends of the previous phase, the total area converted from
dryland to other land use types was the largest from 2000 to 2015, reaching
509.31 km2 in which the areas converted from dryland to grassland
and deciduous broad-leaved bush were the largest, reaching 345.65 and 104.61
km2, respectively; followed by the area converted from grassland
to deciduous broad-leaved bush, which was 129.99 km2.
|
Table 6 Dynamic
transfer matric of land use from 1991 to 2000 (Area unit:
km2)
Types before transfer
|
Land use/cover types after transfer
|
Sum
|
X1
|
X2
|
X3
|
X4
|
X5
|
X6
|
X7
|
X9
|
X10
|
X11
|
X12
|
X13
|
X1
|
?C
|
?C
|
1.08
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
1.08
|
X3
|
24.10
|
?C
|
?C
|
2.85
|
301.23
|
0.47
|
32.13
|
0.71
|
1.32
|
?C
|
?C
|
1.12
|
363.93
|
X4
|
0.31
|
?C
|
7.04
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
7.35
|
X5
|
0.35
|
?C
|
37.99
|
0.09
|
?C
|
?C
|
14.93
|
2.76
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
56.12
|
X6
|
0.04
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.30
|
?C
|
1.31
|
2.26
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
3.91
|
X7
|
?C
|
?C
|
4.55
|
?C
|
13.78
|
0.26
|
?C
|
2.76
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
21.35
|
X8
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.05
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.15
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.20
|
X9
|
?C
|
0.74
|
?C
|
?C
|
1.86
|
10.89
|
0.82
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
1.33
|
?C
|
15.64
|
X10
|
0.05
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.05
|
X11
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.10
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.10
|
Sum
|
24.85
|
0.74
|
50.81
|
2.94
|
317.17
|
11.62
|
49.19
|
8.49
|
1.32
|
0.15
|
1.33
|
1.12
|
469.73
|
Notes: Residence (X1), Evergreen
coniferous forest (X2), Dryland (X3), River (X4), Grass
land (X5),
Broadleaved deciduous forest (X6), Deciduous broad-leaved bush (X7),
Bare land (X8),
Coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest (X9), Transportation
(X10),
Reservoir/Pit (X11),
Deciduous coniferous forest (X12), Industrial land (X13), and?? ‒??
represent that there is no conversion between the two types of land use.
Table 7 Dynamic
transfer matric of land use from 2000 to 2015 (Area unit:
km2)
Types
before transfer
|
Land
use/cover types after transfer
|
Sum
|
X1
|
X2
|
X3
|
X4
|
X5
|
X6
|
X7
|
X8
|
X9
|
X10
|
X11
|
X12
|
X13
|
X14
|
X1
|
?C
|
?C
|
8.25
|
0.35
|
1.23
|
?C
|
0.24
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.07
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.69
|
?C
|
10.83
|
X3
|
30.46
|
0.19
|
?C
|
2.25
|
345.65
|
1.22
|
104.61
|
14.39
|
0.10
|
4.41
|
0.09
|
?C
|
4.56
|
1.38
|
509.31
|
X4
|
0.42
|
?C
|
7.02
|
?C
|
0.19
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.56
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
8.19
|
X5
|
0.59
|
0.48
|
46.04
|
0.12
|
?C
|
3.19
|
129.99
|
3.52
|
5.11
|
0.36
|
0.26
|
0.06
|
?C
|
?C
|
190.51
|
X6
|
?C
|
1.32
|
0.24
|
0.16
|
0.28
|
?C
|
0.86
|
?C
|
0.13
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
3.03
|
X7
|
0.25
|
1.28
|
5.45
|
0.39
|
14.22
|
0.17
|
?C
|
0.29
|
2.23
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
1.58
|
25.86
|
X9
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.03
|
?C
|
0.46
|
?C
|
0.24
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.03
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.76
|
X11
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.08
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.08
|
X13
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.03
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
?C
|
0.03
|
Sum
|
31.72
|
3.27
|
67.14
|
3.27
|
362.03
|
4.58
|
235.94
|
18.20
|
7.57
|
5.40
|
0.38
|
0.06
|
5.25
|
3.79
|
748.60
|
Notes: Residence (X1), Evergreen
coniferous forest (X2), Dryland (X3), River (X4), Grass
land (X5),
Broadleaved deciduous forest (X6), Deciduous broad-leaved bush (X7),
Bare land (X8),
Coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest (X9), Transportation
(X10),
Reservoir/Pit (X11),
Deciduous coniferous forest (X12), Industrial land (X13),
Stope (X14), and
??‒??
represent that there is no conversion between the two types of land use.
Figure
5 Change trends of meteorological elements in
Jingchuan basin from 1960 to 2015
|
Thus, the project
of returning farmland to forestland or grassland was still carried out during
the 2000-2015 period, and the area converted
from grassland to forestland continued to increase. Since 1991, the state has
been paying extra attention to the ecological restoration and protection of the
Jingchuan basin[2].
4.2.3 Monthly Variation Trend of Meteorological
Elements from 1960 to 2015
Figure
5 shows the trends of sunshine hours, monthly minimum temperature, monthly
maximum temperature and monthly average temperature from 1960 to 2015 in the
Jingchuan basin.
Figure 5a displays
that the variation trend of each temperature factor is identical, and
distribution is arched. The temperature gradually increases from January to
July, reaches the maximum in July and gradually decreases from July to
December. Moreover, the difference between the monthly mean temperature and the
monthly minimum temperature at both ends of the arch is the smallest. The
difference between the monthly maximum or minimum temperature in June and July
is the largest in the middle of the arch. The quadratic function is the best
choice to fit the relationship between temperature and month, R2?? 0.910,3. Figure 5b shows
that the average annual sunshine duration in the Jingchuan basin was about 200
h during the 1960 and 2015 period, with an arch distribution in months, reached
peak sunshine hours in July but fell to the bottom in February and November.
Amongst which the sunshine duration in July 2000 was the largest, reaching
304.3 h; and that in September 1975 was the smallest, with only 60.2 h. The
distribution of annual sunshine hours is relatively concentrated in January,
March-May and December, whereas it is
scattered in February and September-November.
4.3 Data Validation
Due
to the long time series of the datasets, validating the accuracy of all land
use/cover information extraction results from 1976 to 2015 through field
surveys or by using high-resolution images is difficult. Moreover, the
practical feasibility is poor. Therefore, only the datasets of 2010 and 2013
were validated in this study to represent the interpretation accuracy of
all-time series images. The field survey sampling points of 2013 and
high-resolution remote sensing images were used to verify the accuracy of image
interpretation results in 2013. Meanwhile, the accuracy of land use
interpretation result in the Jingchuan basin in 2010 was verified on the basis
of the existing ecological decade dataset (2010) and sampling point data of
high-resolution remote sensing images. The confusion matrix indicated that the
Kappa coefficient is greater than 0.853,2, the secondary classification
accuracy is higher than 86.65%, and the accuracy of the first classification is
above 90%. In general, when the Kappa
coefficient is greater than 0.61, the classification effect is considered good.
Therefore, the classification accuracy of land use datasets in this study is
reliable. However, distinguishing coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forests
from broad-leaved deciduous forests is sometimes difficult, especially
vegetation types with similar spectral bands. The identification accuracy of
other land use types, such as reservoir/pit, residence, bare land, industrial
land, human activity land, grassland, dryland and deciduous broad-leaved bush,
is high, reaching 82%-96%.
5 Discussion and Conclusion
Based
on the Landsat MSS/TM/OLI images from 1976 to 2015, land use and corresponding
dynamic change information were extracted using the methods of decision
tree classification and object-oriented information extraction. The accuracy of the second classification is higher than 86.65%.
The data indicated: (1) the area of dryland decreased, whereas the areas of
grassland and broad-leaved deciduous forest increased over the years; (2) the
land area of human activities constantly increased, but the land use types in
the Jingchuan basin have remained stable since 1991; (3) the variation trend of
every meteorological element in the Jingchuan basin was basically the same,
with an arch distribution, and all reached the maximum in July. The quadratic
function was the best choice to fit the variation trend between temperature
factor and month from 1960 to 2015, and R2??0.910,3.
Author Contributions
Wang, Y. Q. guided the research and development of the dataset. Hu, L. B.
contributed to the data collecting and preprocessing. Wang, R. contributed to
the data analysis and wrote the data paper.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1]
Liu, F., Xiong, W., Wang, Y.
H., et al. Relationship between
landscape pattern and runoff based on LUCC in Jinghe river watershed [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and
Environment, 2019, 33(1): 137-141.
[2]
Li, S. Y., Liu, R. F.
Comprehensive benefits research of ecological protection and management in
Jinghe river basin from the perspective of returning farmland to forest: taking
ecological Jingchuan as an example [J]. Modern
Business Trade Industry, 2021, 42(8): 162-163.
[3]
Dang, S. Z., Jiang, X. H., Dong,
G. T., et al. Variation of actual
evapotranspiration and its causes analysis in the upper reaches of the Jinghe
river basin [J]. Research of Soil and
Water Conservation, 2016, 23(2): 143-147.
[4]
Liu, C. M., Liu, X. M., Tian,
W., et al. Ecological protection and
high-quality development of the Yellow river basin urgently need to solve the
water shortage [J]. Yellow River,
2020, 42(9): 6-9.
[5]
Liu, F. Land use landscape
pattern change and its effect on runoff in Jinghe river basin [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2018.
[6]
Ouyang, Z. Y., Wang, Q., Zheng,
H., et al. National ecosystem survey
and assessment of china (2000-2010) [J].
Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2014, 29(4): 462?C466.
[7]
Wang, R., Wang, Y. Q., Hu, L.
B. Time series dataset of land use/cover change in the Jingchuan basin
(1976?C2015) [J/DB/OL]. Digital Journal of
Global Change Data Repository, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3974/geodb.2021.09.03.V1.
https://cstr.escience.org.cn/CSTR:20146.11.2021.09.03.V1.
[8]
GCdataPR Editorial Office.
GCdataPR data sharing policy [OL]. https://doi.org/10.3974/dp.policy.2014.05
(Updated 2017).